Are Black Women at Greater Risk From PFAS in Beauty Products?

If you’re someone who loves long-lasting foundation or waterproof mascara, you might be exposing yourself to toxic chemicals known as PFAS. These "forever chemicals" don’t just sit on your skin—they seep into your body, potentially causing serious health issues. What’s worse, a recent report from the EWG suggests that Black women may face a higher risk of PFAS exposure. This is due to the beauty products marketed to them.

But there’s hope. A new bill called the "No PFAS in Cosmetics Act" aims to ban these toxic substances from personal care products altogether. Let’s explore what this could mean for Black women and why PFAS are dangerous. It will also discuss how this bill could change the beauty industry for good. 

What Are PFAS and Why Are They Dangerous?

PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are synthetic chemicals designed to resist water, oil, and heat. That’s why they’re so common in beauty products labeled “long-wearing” or “waterproof,” reports The Conversation. 

However, the very properties that make PFAS so effective in cosmetics also make them incredibly dangerous. These chemicals do not break down easily, allowing them to build up in the environment and drinking water. Over time, they also accumulate in human bloodstreams, increasing long-term health risks.

Widespread PFAS contamination has sparked legal battles, including lawsuits against companies responsible for it. The AFFF lawsuit update reveals that PFAS-containing firefighting foam has contaminated water near military bases and airports, increasing cancer risks for nearby communities.

Additionally, the same toxic chemicals are found in many personal care products, reported the Guardian recently. It raises concerns about everyday exposure to these harmful substances linked to environmental contamination.

The Hidden Health Risks of PFAS in Beauty Products

The health effects of PFAS exposure are increasingly concerning, with evidence linking these chemicals to serious illnesses. The Silent Spring Institute reported in 2025 that PFAS increases the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. These chemicals also disrupt hormones, affecting fertility and weakening the immune system. Even at low levels, PFAS exposure is connected to higher cholesterol and liver damage, highlighting the health risks they pose.

Recent investigations have shed light on just how prevalent PFAS are in cosmetics. 

A November 2023 CBC News report tested popular makeup brands and found that three out of four products contained PFAS. This discovery reveals that millions unknowingly apply harmful chemicals to their skin daily. Each use increases exposure and potential health risks.

Why Are Black Women at Greater Risk?

PFAS exposure isn’t just a general concern. Research shows that Black women may be disproportionately affected by these chemicals due to the types of products marketed to them. 

A study from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found higher PFAS levels in Black and Hispanic/Latino communities' drinking water. But that's just part of the problem. Many beauty pruducts targeting Black women—such as hair relaxers, edge control gels, and long-wear foundations—are more likely to contain PFAS.

The 2024 ChemForward report identified 45 high-hazard chemicals in beauty and personal care products, including certain PFAS. Many of these products are heavily marketed to Black women. The act reinforces the environmental injustice that communities of color face when it comes to toxic exposure.

How the “No PFAS in Cosmetics Act” Could Change the Game

Major industry players are starting to take action. In 2023, Cosmetics Europe, a top industry association, urged manufacturers to phase out PFAS by the end of 2025. If the US enforces this ban, beauty products will become safer for everyone. Black women, who face higher exposure, will benefit the most.

In the US, growing concerns led to the introduction of the "No PFAS in Cosmetic Act" (H.R. 6519, 2023). The aim was to ban the intentional use of PFAS in cosmetics. Simultaneously, a 2023 ECHA proposal follows the European Union lead, where the European Chemicals Agency has already proposed restrictions on PFAS compounds.

Women Leading the Fight Against PFAS

Advocacy efforts have played a huge role in pushing for PFAS bans. Activist Madhvi Chittoor, at just 11 years old, played a key role in influencing PFAS bans in Colorado. Time reports that her efforts demonstrate that change is possible. Environmental justice groups are also leading the charge, highlighting how toxic beauty standards disproportionately harm women of color.

Nonprofits like The Environmental Working Group (EWG) have been pushing for stricter regulations, demanding more transparency from brands, and educating consumers about safer alternatives.

Moving Toward Non-Toxic Products

Banning PFAS is just the first step toward a safer beauty industry. Corporate accountability and ingredient transparency are crucial for true change. According to TorHoerman Law, the AFFF lawsuit has held manufacturers liable for PFAS contamination, highlighting the need for stricter regulations. This case shows that companies have used these toxic chemicals knowingly for years. Hence, it further emphasizes the urgency of a ban on PFAS in consumer products.

Consumers can drive change by choosing PFAS-free brands, supporting the No PFAS in Cosmetics Act, and demanding safer products. Beauty should enhance health, not compromise it.

FAQs 

How can I check if my beauty products contain PFAS?

Start by reading the ingredient list carefully. Look for chemicals with “perfluoro” or “polyfluoro” in their names, such as perfluorooctyl triethoxysilane, perfluorodecalin, or PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene). These indicate PFAS presence. However, many brands do not disclose PFAS because they can be part of a product's formulation without appearing on the label.

What can I do to support the “No PFAS in Cosmetics Act”?

Reach out to your local representatives to show your support for the bill. Emphasize the importance of banning harmful chemicals in beauty products. Engage with organizations like Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, which advocate for safer cosmetics and support this legislation. Stay informed about the bill's progress through reliable sources such as Congress.gov.

Why are lawsuits against beauty brands more challenging than the AFFF case?

Lawsuits against beauty brands are harder than AFFF cases. Firefighting foams have a clear link to cancers in firefighters. Beauty products vary in formulas and usage. This makes proving PFAS exposure and health effects difficult. The lack of direct causation weakens claims against beauty brands compared to AFFF litigation.

PFAS exposure is not just a beauty issue—it’s a health and justice issue. The fight against PFAS is a fight for safer products, corporate accountability, and protection for communities most at risk. Let’s continue demanding change so the beauty industry finally prioritizes health over harmful chemicals.